In the context of rapid digital health development, cybersecurity has become a core requirement for medical software and health applications. IEC 81001-5-1 is the first international standard specifically targeting health software. It complements IEC 82304-1 and IEC 62304, filling a long‑standing gap in IT security requirements.

The European Union has already included IEC 81001-5-1 in its harmonization application list. It is scheduled to be formally harmonized on May 27, 2028, which means it will become a critical basis for future compliance and market access.

 

Who Needs to Pay Attention to IEC 81001-5-1

This standard applies not only to medical device manufacturers but also to healthcare sector software and other health software developers. To help different stakeholders benchmark their situation, the following table summarizes major regulatory frameworks, applicable product scopes, and typical examples:

Regulatory FrameworkApplicable Product ScopeExamples
U.S. FDAMedical devices with connectable software under QMS regulations (21 CFR Part 820). FDA considers cybersecurity an integral part of quality and safety.- Diagnostics: Cloud‑connected medical imaging software, home glucose meters and their apps.
- Therapeutics: Networked infusion pumps, remotely programmed pacemakers.
- Patient Monitoring: Remote patient monitoring platforms, wearable ECG patches.
- Laboratory Support: Cloud software for genomic sequencing data analysis.
EU MDRMedical device software within MDR scope that has connectivity features. Manufacturers must establish and implement risk management systems.- Diagnostics: AI software for diagnosis requiring hospital network data.
- Therapeutics: Radiotherapy systems with remote control.
- Patient Monitoring: Home monitoring systems transmitting vital signs to physicians.
- Laboratory Support: Platforms managing clinical trial data.

From the table, it is clear that all regulations converge on “health software”: any software used to manage, maintain, or improve personal health, or embedded/used alongside medical devices, falls within scope. The standard also emphasizes that both manufacturers and healthcare delivery organizations (HDOs) share responsibility for identifying and fixing security vulnerabilities.

 

 

Core Requirements

IEC 81001-5-1 focuses on IT security management throughout the software lifecycle, covering:

  • General Requirements: Quality management system, IT security risk management, component risk assessment
  • Process Requirements: Development, maintenance, risk management, configuration management, issue resolution processes
  • Special Requirements:
  1. Embed cybersecurity processes into the quality management system
  2. Strictly manage suppliers’ upstream cybersecurity risks
  3. Ensure continuous improvement and security updates
  4. Conduct external testing independent of the development team to ensure objectivity
  • Annex Best Practices: Secure coding, threat analysis, risk management methods, health software development planning guidelines

 

 

Relationship with Other Standards

IEC 81001-5-1 supplements IEC 82304-1 and IEC 62304 by requiring cybersecurity measures at every stage of the development process.

  • Based on IEC 62443-4-1 industrial cybersecurity requirements, but tailored specifically for health software.
  • IEC 62304 defines the software lifecycle; IEC 81001-5-1 adds IT security measures to it.
  • IEC 82304-1/2 covers general health software requirements and quality labels; IEC 81001-5-1 further specifies cybersecurity.
  • MDR Alignment: IEC 81001-5-1 fills the gap in MDR Annex I, Section 17.2, becoming a key compliance support for medical device software.
  • Appendix A: Clarifies relationships with IEC 62443 and IEC 62304 to help companies avoid duplication of work.

 

 

Implementation Advantages and Challenges

  • Advantages
  1. Comprehensive yet concise: Covers all key aspects of health software cybersecurity in a compact format, easy for companies to grasp.
  2. Clear responsibilities, strong operability: Clauses distinguish “must” vs. “should,” enabling quick translation into internal processes.
  3. Strategic and practical balance: Provides both overall framework and practical references, bridging compliance and implementation.
  • Challenges and Countermeasures

Some requirements remain abstract, requiring industry best practices for effective implementation. For example, “expected product security context” must be documented but lacks specific methods; companies must identify adjacent systems and interaction roles themselves.

Recommendation: Combine IEC 81001-5-1 with external guidelines (e.g., Johner Institute IT Security Guide) and practical experience to ensure cybersecurity measures are truly effective.

 

 

Conclusion

IEC 81001-5-1 is a long‑awaited cybersecurity standard for medical devices and health software. Even before formal harmonization, it aligns with EU regulations, reflecting the urgent industry need for unified standards.

For companies, the benefits are clear:

  1. Compliance Assurance: Helps meet MDR requirements and reduce compliance risks.
  2. Market Access: Once harmonized, it will be a key prerequisite for entering the European market.
  3. Enhanced Security: Standardized processes and best practices improve product safety and credibility.

Medical device manufacturers and health software developers should begin implementing IEC 81001-5-1 now. Even before formal harmonization, it is already regarded as “state of the art” and is critical for compliance and security.

As a certification body, we not only provide compliance audits but also help companies understand and implement these requirements, ensuring smooth passage through future EU harmonization reviews.

Author

DQS HK

"In everything we do, we set the highest standards for quality and competence in every project. This makes our actions the benchmark for our industry, but also our own mission statement, which we renew every day"

Loading...

You Might Also Enjoy These Reads

Discover more articles that dive deep into related themes and ideas.
Blog
Loading...

AWS and Azure Are ISO 27001 Certified — But That Doesn't Mean Your Company Is

Blog
Loading...

NIS-2 for Managing Directors: Duties, Liability, and Implementation

Blog
Loading...

Why ISO 42001 is the Essential Strategic Upgrade to Your ISO 27001 Certification