In today’s global business environment, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings have become essential tools for companies to demonstrate sustainability, manage risks, and meet stakeholder expectations. Among the most widely adopted ESG assessment and disclosure systems are EcoVadis and CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project). Though often mentioned together, these two frameworks serve different purposes and audiences. Understanding their distinctions is crucial for companies deciding where to focus their ESG reporting and strategy.
What is EcoVadis?
EcoVadis is a trusted ESG rating platform used by over 100,000 companies across 175+ countries. It evaluates how well a company’s sustainability practices are integrated into its business and management system. The assessment is based on four themes: Environment, Labor & Human Rights, Ethics, and Sustainable Procurement.
EcoVadis provides a score from 0 to 100, alongside a medal (Bronze, Silver, Gold, or Platinum), which companies can share with customers and partners. This makes it especially useful in B2B supplier evaluations and global procurement processes.
EcoVadis is ideal for:
- Suppliers in global value chains
- Manufacturing and trading companies
- SMEs and large enterprises aiming to meet client ESG requirements
What is CDP?
CDP is a global environmental disclosure platform that collects detailed data on corporate climate actions, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and sustainability strategies. CDP questionnaires are aligned with leading standards such as the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and are widely used by investors and regulatory bodies.
Companies that report to CDP are scored based on transparency, risk management, and progress toward climate targets. CDP scores range from D- to A and provide credibility in financial and regulatory contexts.
CDP is ideal for:
- Publicly listed companies
- Firms with investor or shareholder pressure
- Companies preparing for climate disclosure regulations (CSRD, SEC, HKEX)
EcoVadis vs CDP: Key Differences in Focus and Application
While both EcoVadis and CDP support corporate sustainability goals, they differ in several key aspects:
- Objective: EcoVadis measures ESG performance for operational due diligence; CDP focuses on environmental risk and climate impact.
- Audience: EcoVadis targets supply chain managers and B2B customers; CDP is investor- and regulator-facing.
- Process: EcoVadis uses a self-assessment with supporting documentation, typically completed in 2–4 weeks. CDP involves a comprehensive, standardized questionnaire requiring deeper internal analysis.
- Scoring System: EcoVadis uses a 0–100 scale with medal ratings; CDP uses performance bands (D- to A).
- Framework Alignment: EcoVadis aligns with ISO 26000, GRI, UNGC; CDP aligns with TCFD, SBTi, ISO 14064, ISO 14067, and the GHG Protocol.
Which ESG Framework Should Your Company Choose?
The answer depends on your business goals and stakeholder expectations:
- Choose EcoVadis : if you are part of international supply chains and need to demonstrate ESG performance to customers.
- Choose CDP : if you want to attract ESG-focused investors, comply with climate regulations, or show climate strategy leadership.
Many companies now pursue both EcoVadis and CDP to meet diverse stakeholder demands and enhance overall ESG credibility.